CleanTech Acquisition Corp.
Built from real-time financials, refreshed daily. For a full Analyst Grade with bull/bear case, price targets, and qualitative risk analysis, generate a CLAQ research report →
Price Chart
About the company
CleanTech Acquisition Corp. currently has no material business operations of its own. Its express purpose is to engage in a business combination, which could take the form of a merger, an exchange of equity, an asset or stock acquisition, a reorganization, or a similar strategic partnership, with one or more existing entities.
- CEO
- Elliot Spiro
- HQ
- New York City, NY, US
Get TickerSpark's AI analysis on CLAQ
Create an account to generate AI analysis on any ticker — technical setup, analyst consensus, earnings watch, insider pulse, financial health, and peer context. Ready in about a minute.
Get Pro Access →Already have an account? Log in
Similar companies
Peers in the same neighborhood.
- Market Cap
- $264.60M
- P/E
- -0.01
- PEG
- -0.00
- P/S
- 0.15
- P/B
- 0.89
- EV/EBITDA
- -0.52
- Div Yield
- 0.00%
- Gross Margin
- -205.30%
- Op Margin
- -568.30%
- Net Margin
- -1137.45%
- ROE
- -1505.94%
- ROIC
- -93.70%
Latest fiscal year · YoY change
- Revenue
- $5.27M+191.9%
- Gross Profit
- $-7,061,605+10.9%
- Op Income
- $-23,726,999
- Net Income
- $-40,828,402+69.7%
- EPS
- $-10.45+71.5%
- OCF Growth
- +4.9%
- FCF Growth
- +3.0%
- Beta
- 0.00
- RSI (14)
- 15
Earnings call summaries
Pick a quarter — each call distilled into takeaways, results, and a bull vs bear read.
Nauticus reported higher sequential revenue but a wider loss, while leaning harder into balance-sheet repair, Toolkit commercialization, and defense/international opportunities.· August 13, 2026
- Revenue was $900 thousand, up $700 thousand sequentially but down $1.2 million year over year.
- Operating expenses were $6.9 million, down $1.6 million from the prior year but up $1 million sequentially.
- Net loss was $11.1 million versus $9.3 million in Q1 2026 and $7.4 million in Q2 2025; adjusted net loss was $7 million.
- Cash ended Q2 2026 at $2 million, down from $7.6 million at the end of 2025.
- Management emphasized debt reduction of $5.5 million, no need for another reverse split today, and a shift toward higher-margin defense, government, and international work.
Revenue for the second quarter of 2026 was $900 thousand, an increase of $700 thousand sequentially and a decrease of $1.2 million versus the same quarter last year. Operating expenses were $6.9 million, down $1.6 million from Q2 2025 and up $1 million sequentially. G&A was $3.3 million, improving by $1.1 million year over year and up less than $100 thousand quarter over quarter. Net loss was $11.1 million versus $9.3 million in Q1 2026 and $7.4 million in Q2 2025; the increase was driven mostly by noncash losses on debt extinguishment. Adjusted net loss was $7 million versus $7.4 million in Q2 2025 and $6.4 million in Q1 2026. Cash at quarter-end was $2 million, compared with $7.6 million at the end of 2025. Management did not provide explicit next-quarter or full-year revenue/EPS guidance, but said it expects Toolkit to start bringing in recurring, predictable revenue from 2027 and said some defense opportunities could contribute revenue this year and into 2027 if awarded.
John Gibson framed 2026 as a difficult year marked by slower offshore markets and delayed customer projects, but said the company has responded by cutting costs, strengthening the balance sheet, broadening markets, and focusing on opportunities with better long-term value. He highlighted progress in the UAE, saying the company has secured a facility and is building relationships there, and he argued Nauticus is shifting toward a more scalable model with software, fixed-price projects, and recurring product/service revenue. His tone was cautiously optimistic and more strategic than tactical, with repeated emphasis on execution, margin, and diversification.
Jimena Begaries said the quarter focused on strengthening the capital structure and preserving the Nasdaq listing, pointing to completed financing steps including the ELOC registration, the Series B certificate of designation, and debt-to-equity exchanges that reduced outstanding debt by $5.5 million. She reported revenue of $900 thousand, operating expenses of $6.9 million, G&A of $3.3 million, net loss of $11.1 million, adjusted net loss of $7 million, and cash of $2 million at quarter-end. She stressed disciplined cost management and said the company’s priorities remain balance-sheet strength, cost control, and financial flexibility for commercial execution and future growth.
In Q&A, Peter Gastreich pressed management on the new primary-contractor strategy, asking about trade-offs in margin, capital intensity, and vessel risk. Brian Allen said Nauticus is not planning long-term charter commitments; instead it wants to use vessels of opportunity, shorten mobilization cycles, and win contracts where Toolkit creates enough margin to justify the work. Peter also asked about the larger defense opportunity and why Gulf of Mexico oil and gas remained weak; management said it is prioritizing longer-duration, more profitable contracts, has active defense proposals, sees no competitor-driven revenue loss, and believes defense/port security can offer better margins than traditional oil and gas.
The bull case is that Nauticus believes it is finally commercializing Toolkit, with management saying the software is now on sale and already validated in customer operations with positive feedback. The company also sees multiple growth paths beyond U.S. offshore oil and gas, including defense, government, the UAE, and international work, while emphasizing that its technology is differentiated by manipulation capability and autonomous subsea performance.
The bear case is that current offshore market conditions have pushed several expected projects into 2027 or beyond, depressing near-term revenue. Cash was only $2 million at quarter-end, the company posted an $11.1 million net loss, and management acknowledged it had foregone some short-term work because it would have required uneconomic vessel commitments. The business also remains early in defense and international markets, so management’s more promising opportunities still need to convert into contracts.
AI summary of the company's earnings call · Paraphrased · Not investment advice
- Free Float
- 33.1%
- Shares Outstanding
- 47.25M
- Float Shares
- 15.65M
of shares held by institutions
44 13F filers
Buy/sell ratio 0.00. Sells can include pre-scheduled 10b5-1 plan sales, not just discretionary selling.
Top institutional holders
Largest 13F positions, with quarter-over-quarter change.
| Holder | Shares | Δ Quarter |
|---|---|---|
| Spring Creek Capital LLC | 250.00K | ▼ 250.00K |
Recent insider transactions
Who's buying, who's selling, and how much.
| Date | Insider | Type | Shares |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 21 | CleanTech Sponsor I LLC | other | 0 |
| Jul 14, 21 | Dhanuka Ankur | other | 0 |
| Jul 14, 21 | Spiro Elliot | other | 0 |
| Jul 14, 21 | Fitzgerald Richard F | other | 0 |
| Jul 14, 21 | Buffalino Louis R. | other | 0 |
| Jul 14, 21 | GROSSMAN JONAS | other | 0 |
| Jul 14, 21 | Najarian Jon | other | 0 |
| Jul 14, 21 | COLE DOUGLAS | other | 0 |
| Jul 14, 21 | CleanTech Investments, LLC | other | 0 |
| Jul 14, 21 | Ide Britt E | other | 0 |
A “Sell” may be a pre-scheduled 10b5-1 plan sale rather than a discretionary decision — read insider selling with that in mind.
Our CLAQ coverage
Recent articles, reports, and earnings notes.
No research on CLAQ yet
For a full analyst-grade research report — grades, price targets, financials, chart analysis — generate one on demand.
Generate CLAQ report →Headlines from third-party outlets — TickerSpark isn't affiliated with these sources.