Cellectis S.A.
Built from real-time financials, refreshed daily. For a full Analyst Grade with bull/bear case, price targets, and qualitative risk analysis, generate a CMVLF research report →
Price Chart
About the company
Cellectis S. A. is a clinical-stage biotechnology firm dedicated to advancing immuno-oncology therapies.
- CEO
- Andre Choulika
- IPO
- 2014
- Employees
- 216
- HQ
- Paris, FR
Get TickerSpark's AI analysis on CMVLF
Create an account to generate AI analysis on any ticker — technical setup, analyst consensus, earnings watch, insider pulse, financial health, and peer context. Ready in about a minute.
Get Pro Access →Already have an account? Log in
Similar companies
Peers in the same neighborhood.
- Market Cap
- $251.93M
- P/E
- -5.29
- PEG
- 0.06
- P/S
- 4.42
- P/B
- 8.48
- EV/EBITDA
- -6.86
- Div Yield
- 0.00%
- Gross Margin
- 74.68%
- Op Margin
- -107.92%
- Net Margin
- -115.36%
- ROE
- -94.14%
- ROIC
- -41.00%
Latest fiscal year · YoY change
- Revenue
- $75.92M+82.9%
- Gross Profit
- $55.04M+32.6%
- Op Income
- $-42,000,532
- Net Income
- $-70,343,970-91.4%
- EPS
- $-0.70-70.7%
- OCF Growth
- -281.1%
- FCF Growth
- -330.3%
- 52W High
- $5.04
- 52W Low
- $1.25
- 50D MA
- $4.41
- 200D MA
- $3.39
- Beta
- 2.75
- RSI (14)
- 85
- Avg Volume
- 3
Earnings call summaries
Pick a quarter — each call distilled into takeaways, results, and a bull vs bear read.
Cellectis said 2025 validated its allogeneic CAR-T strategy, with lasme-cel showing strong response rates and the company guiding to multiple 2026 data readouts while cash runway extends into H2 2027.· March 20, 2026
- lasme-cel posted 100% overall response in the target Phase II population, and all 9 patients in that group became transplant eligible.
- Management said the pivotal lasme-cel study is now enrolling, with first interim data from 40 patients expected in Q4 2026 and a planned BLA submission in H2 2028.
- eti-cel showed 88% overall response and 63% complete response in 8 evaluable patients; full Phase I data, including low-dose IL-2 cohorts, is expected later in 2026.
- Cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and fixed term deposits totaled $211 million at December 31, 2025, and management said that is sufficient to fund operations into H2 2027.
- Cellectis said the December 2025 arbitration returned UCART19 V1 / ALLO-501 to the company, but did not affect ALLO-501A or cema-cel milestone eligibility.
For the full year ended December 31, 2025, Cellectis reported cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and fixed term deposits classified as current financial assets of $211 million, down from $264 million at December 31, 2024. Management said the $53 million decrease was mainly driven by $36.9 million cash in from revenue, $8.4 million of interest received, offset by $50.5 million in supplier payments, $40 million in wages/bonuses/social expenses, $11 million in lease debt payments, and $5.4 million in PGE loan repayment. The company said its cash position is sufficient to fund operations into H2 2027. Revenue growth, gross margin, EPS, and consolidated net loss figures were not stated on the call; management referred listeners to the press release for the net loss. Forward guidance centers on several 2026 milestones: lasme-cel first interim analysis of 40 patients in Q4 2026, eti-cel full Phase I data later in 2026, Servier/Allogene cema-cel interim futility analysis in Q2 2026, and Iovance IOV-4001 clinical results this year.
Andre Choulika framed 2025 as validation of Cellectis’ long-term allogeneic CAR-T thesis and said the company “stepped forward” while others pulled back. He emphasized lasme-cel’s 100% response in the target Phase II population, the bridge-to-transplant strategy, and the idea that off-the-shelf therapy can help patients who are too sick or too time-constrained for autologous approaches. His tone was confident and bullish on the platform, repeatedly pointing to 2026 as a year of “data, milestones and momentum.”
Arthur Stril stressed disciplined cash management and focus on lasme-cel, eti-cel, and the company’s manufacturing sites in Paris and Raleigh. He said cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and fixed term deposits totaled $211 million at December 31, 2025 and should fund operations into H2 2027. He also quantified the year-over-year change in cash and broke out the main uses and sources, including $36.9 million from revenue, $8.4 million of interest income, $50.5 million in supplier payments, $40 million in wages and social expenses, $11 million in lease debt payments, and $5.4 million in PGE loan repayment. He added that the AstraZeneca collaboration positively impacted 2025 revenue, though he did not give a full revenue figure on the call.
Analysts focused on lasme-cel enrollment timing, how the first 40-patient dose-optimization readout will work, and whether there could be a meaningful difference between the two alemtuzumab doses. Management said site opening is on track, the first analysis is based on an earlier 8-week cutoff rather than 3-month CR/CRi, and the protocol allows continued recruitment while the optimization discussion proceeds. Questions also centered on the Servier arbitration and CD52 preconditioning; Arthur said the ruling only affected UCART19 V1 / ALLO-501, not ALLO-501A or cema-cel, preserving up to $340 million in development and sales milestones, while Adrian argued alemtuzumab is important for outcomes and that Cellectis is using a lower, carefully optimized dose with extensive risk mitigation.
The company has multiple near-term catalysts: lasme-cel interim data in Q4 2026, eti-cel full Phase I data later this year, and partner readouts from cema-cel and Iovance. Management highlighted strong early efficacy signals, including lasme-cel’s 100% response in the target population and eti-cel’s 88% ORR / 63% CR, plus a cash runway into H2 2027. They also argued that off-the-shelf manufacturing avoids apheresis bottlenecks and could support faster access and better economics than autologous CAR-T.
The key risks are execution and data validation: lasme-cel still needs to prove the optimized alemtuzumab regimen and sustain results in the pivotal study, and eti-cel’s IL-2 hypothesis is not yet proven. Management also acknowledged that some competitors are moving away from CD52/alemtuzumab, and that outpatient delivery is not yet available. On the business side, the arbitration created uncertainty around one product, and the company is still largely dependent on clinical-stage milestones and partner updates rather than commercial revenue.
AI summary of the company's earnings call · Paraphrased · Not investment advice
- Free Float
- 64.3%
- Shares Outstanding
- 72.60M
- Float Shares
- 46.69M
Our CMVLF coverage
Recent articles, reports, and earnings notes.
No research on CMVLF yet
For a full analyst-grade research report — grades, price targets, financials, chart analysis — generate one on demand.
Generate CMVLF report →