Leef Brands Inc.
Built from real-time financials, refreshed daily. For a full Analyst Grade with bull/bear case, price targets, and qualitative risk analysis, generate a LEEF.CN research report →
Price Chart
About the company
Leef Brands Inc. operates as a U. S.
- CEO
- Micah Anderson
- IPO
- 2013
- Employees
- 81
- HQ
- Vancouver, BC, CA
Get TickerSpark's AI analysis on LEEF.CN
Create an account to generate AI analysis on any ticker — technical setup, analyst consensus, earnings watch, insider pulse, financial health, and peer context. Ready in about a minute.
Get Pro Access →Already have an account? Log in
Similar companies
Peers in the same neighborhood.
- Market Cap
- $58.63M
- P/E
- -2.32
- PEG
- -0.04
- P/S
- 1.28
- P/B
- -29.46
- EV/EBITDA
- -4.45
- Div Yield
- 0.00%
- Gross Margin
- 31.46%
- Op Margin
- -4.90%
- Net Margin
- -50.33%
- ROE
- 206.83%
- ROIC
- -3.47%
Latest fiscal year · YoY change
- Revenue
- $30.75M+7.9%
- Gross Profit
- $7.62M-14.8%
- Op Income
- $-11,865,756
- Net Income
- $-17,629,675+28.4%
- EPS
- $-0.10+41.2%
- OCF Growth
- -282.4%
- FCF Growth
- -1.6%
- 52W High
- $0.33
- 52W Low
- $0.14
- 50D MA
- $0.27
- 200D MA
- $0.23
- Beta
- 0.30
- RSI (14)
- 56
- Avg Volume
- 200.14K
Earnings call summaries
Pick a quarter — each call distilled into takeaways, results, and a bull vs bear read.
Leef Brands said Q2 revenue softened as expected while vertical integration, a completed harvest, and a strengthened balance sheet set up a margin rebound in the second half of 2026 and beyond.· August 6, 2026
- Revenue declined 16% to $7.3 million, but gross profit rose 62% year over year to $2.4 million and gross margin nearly doubled to 33% from 17%.
- Adjusted EBITDA was negative $631,000 in the quarter, though first-half adjusted EBITDA remained positive at $1.7 million versus negative $2.1 million a year ago.
- Management said Q2 was intentionally softer because the company chose not to overbuy third-party biomass ahead of its own harvest, prioritizing inventory and margin over near-term volume.
- The company completed an oversubscribed $9.3 million financing and later raised another $5.2 million in July, ending the quarter with $5 million of cash and $7.1 million of inventory.
- Leef highlighted progress on Salisbury Canyon Ranch, with cultivation around 80 acres after adding 14 new acres and plans to reach 122 acres by fall, while also building toward the full 180-acre footprint in 2027.
Q2 net revenue was $7.3 million, down from $8.7 million in Q2 last year, a 16% decline. Gross profit increased 62% year over year to $2.4 million, and gross margin rose to 33% from 17%. Adjusted EBITDA was negative $631,000. Unit volumes were down about 20%, partly offset by roughly 5% higher average selling prices. Management said Q2 was softer by design as it waited for its own harvest and bought only third-party biomass that made economic sense. Looking ahead, the company expects distillate volumes and the margin benefit from running its own biomass to rebound in the second half of Q3 and into Q4, with gross margins targeted around 50% as self-grown material ramps back in. Management also said HIMALAYA contributed approximately $1 million in revenue in the partial quarter after acquisition and is expected to deliver strong growth in 2027.
Micah Anderson framed the quarter as validation of Leef’s vertical integration strategy, saying the company is in a stronger position after completing the harvest, expanding cultivation, acquiring HIMALAYA Vapor Company, and advancing DEA registration applications. He emphasized that the company’s clean biomass, quality-control advantages, and expanded processing capacity are central to future growth, margin improvement, and readiness for interstate or international opportunities. His tone was upbeat and highly confident, repeatedly saying the farm and platform are only getting bigger and that 2027 is a key inflection point.
Kevin Wilson emphasized the financial payoff from owning the input material, noting that gross margins climbed from around 20% to 50% when the business ran on Salisbury Canyon Ranch material from Q3 last year through Q1 this year, versus 33% in Q2 when it relied on purchased biomass. He said net revenue was $7.3 million versus $8.7 million a year ago, gross profit was $2.4 million versus $1.5 million a year ago, and first-half adjusted EBITDA was positive $1.7 million versus negative $2.1 million last year. He also highlighted liquidity improvement, with cash at $5 million versus $2.2 million at year-end, working capital moving to an $8.7 million surplus from a deficit, and inventory rising to $7.1 million from $3.4 million at year-end; he said roughly $9 million was raised in the first half and another $5.2 million in July, for about $14.2 million for the year.
Analysts focused on two main issues: how interstate commerce and international exports could open up new demand, and how margins should improve as the company’s own biomass returns in the second half of Q3. Management said larger MSOs are showing “unanimously positive” interest because Leef can do the difficult parts of the supply chain—growing and extraction—while partners focus on brands and retail. On margins, Micah said Q2 was a trade-off for Q3 and Q4, and that gross margin should move back toward about 50% as self-grown material re-enters production, with additional upside from hydrocarbon and solvent lines and from a new processing/storage facility.
The bull case from this call is that Q2 appears to have been a deliberate trough before a harvest-driven rebound, with management expecting margin recovery as company-grown biomass re-enters the business in Q3 and Q4. Bulls can point to improving gross profit despite lower revenue, a stronger cash position, a larger cultivation footprint, and early signs that HIMALAYA and the processing facility could expand margins and branded product opportunities.
The main risks discussed were dependence on California wholesale pricing, the temporary loss of company-grown biomass, and uncertainty around the timing of interstate commerce and international market access. Management also acknowledged that Q2 volume declined because it chose not to chase low-margin sales, and that the company is still working through certification, facility upgrades, and regulatory steps before those larger opportunities can become real.
AI summary of the company's earnings call · Paraphrased · Not investment advice
- Free Float
- 86.2%
- Shares Outstanding
- 205.72M
- Float Shares
- 177.24M
Our LEEF.CN coverage
Recent articles, reports, and earnings notes.
No research on LEEF.CN yet
For a full analyst-grade research report — grades, price targets, financials, chart analysis — generate one on demand.
Generate LEEF.CN report →