TeraWulf Inc.
Built from real-time financials, refreshed daily. For a full Analyst Grade with bull/bear case, price targets, and qualitative risk analysis, generate a WULF research report →
Range $28 – $72
Price Chart
About the company
TeraWulf Inc. , together with its subsidiaries, owns, develops, operates digital infrastructure in the United States. It also develops and operates bitcoin mining facilities for bitcoin mining and high-performance computing workloads, leveraging clean, cost-effective, and reliable energy.
- CEO
- Paul Prager
- IPO
- 1994
- Employees
- 141
- HQ
- Easton, MD, US
AI snapshot
Six angles, distilled from the data.
The stock is in a volatile recovery phase, still below its 200-day average of 17.73 after spending much of the year well above and well below that line. It remains far under the 52-week high of 29.84, but the recent rebound from the 8.60 low shows a sharp, high-beta turnaround attempt rather than a settled uptrend.
Street sentiment is firmly constructive: 14 buys and no holds or sells, with a consensus buy rating. The average target sits at 38.50, well above the current share price, and recent actions have mostly been reiterations or target raises, including Morgan Stanley to 72 and Cantor to 37.
The earnings profile is still challenged, with the last quarter missing by 85% and the prior two misses also wide. Full-year estimates point to a smaller loss next year at -0.24 EPS, so shareholders should watch whether revenue growth and operating leverage start narrowing the gap.
Recent insider activity leans negative on discretionary trades, led by CEO Paul Prager’s 137,500-share sale and a Chief Strategy Officer sale of 276,500 shares. Most other filings are awards, exempt exercises, or vesting-related moves, which are less informative than the two open-market sales.
Profitability is still weak, but the gross margin is a solid 69.3%, showing the core business can generate attractive unit economics. Growth remains soft with revenue down 6% year over year, while the balance sheet carries $5.20 billion of debt against $3.27 billion of cash, leaving net debt of about $1.93 billion.
WULF trades like a high-beta digital infrastructure name, with a 4.29 beta and a valuation that still reflects turnaround expectations rather than stable cash generation. The setup favors investors who want leveraged upside to operating improvement, but the market is still pricing in execution risk.
Similar companies
Peers in the same neighborhood.
- Market Cap
- $7.83B
- P/E
- -3.59
- Fwd P/E
- 49.45
- PEG
- 0.03
- P/S
- 47.38
- P/B
- 52.09
- EV/EBITDA
- -11.83
- Div Yield
- 0.00%
- Gross Margin
- 69.26%
- Op Margin
- -228.47%
- Net Margin
- -1179.94%
- ROE
- -1708.70%
- ROIC
- -6.89%
Latest fiscal year · YoY change
- Revenue
- $168.46M+20.3%
- Gross Profit
- $85.79M+10.8%
- Op Income
- $-170,309,000
- Net Income
- $-661,416,000-813.3%
- EPS
- $-1.66-690.5%
- OCF Growth
- -404.4%
- FCF Growth
- -304.8%
- 52W High
- $29.84
- 52W Low
- $8.60
- 50D MA
- $21.11
- 200D MA
- $17.74
- Beta
- 4.29
- RSI (14)
- 40
- Avg Volume
- 32.65M
Earnings call summaries
Pick a quarter — each call distilled into takeaways, results, and a bull vs bear read.
TeraWulf said Q2 was an execution quarter, with Lake Mariner ramping, Kentucky expanding, and management reaffirming its annual contracted capacity target despite labor and power-market constraints.· August 5, 2026
- Q2 revenue was $44.8 million, up from $34.0 million in Q1, driven mainly by more HPC capacity coming online.
- HPC lease revenue rose 52% quarter over quarter to $31.9 million and was about 71% of total revenue.
- CB-3 is now online and generating revenue; CB-4 is expected to begin generating lease revenue in late September and CB-5 in very early January.
- Management said the Anthropic lease at Justified represents about $19 billion of contracted revenue over 20 years, and the Abernathy JV sale is expected to bring about $530 million.
- The company reaffirmed its target of contracting an incremental 250 to 500 megawatts of critical IT capacity annually.
Revenue was $44.8 million in Q2 versus $34.0 million in Q1. HPC lease revenue increased 52% quarter over quarter to $31.9 million and represented approximately 71% of total revenue. Cost of revenue, excluding depreciation, was $12.4 million versus $2.4 million in Q1; operating expenses were $23.4 million versus $11.2 million; SG&A was $126.9 million versus $127.8 million, and adjusted SG&A was $28.6 million versus $26.3 million. Reported HPC leasing segment profit margin was approximately 28%, while adjusted for tenant fit-out revenue/costs, pre-revenue operating costs and development costs, margin was approximately 80%. GAAP net loss attributable to TeraWulf was $939.9 million versus $427.6 million in Q1, and non-GAAP adjusted EBITDA was negative $18.3 million versus negative $4.1 million. Cash and restricted cash were about $3.0 billion at June 30; unrestricted parent cash was about $1.2 billion, rising to about $1.45 billion after the initial $250 million Abernathy payment. At WULF Compute, gross cash was about $1.9 billion, or about $1.5 billion net of reserves and construction accounts. Management said approximately $2.3 billion of project capex has been completed with about $1.7 billion remaining, and total project cost is now estimated at about $9.1 million per megawatt. Forward-looking items included CB-4 initial delivery in late September, CB-5 energization in very early January, more than $500 million of incremental lease revenue from the FluidStack amendments, and no need to access the equity markets based on current liquidity and expected Abernathy proceeds.
Paul Prager framed the quarter as one of execution and expansion: CB-3 was delivered, Lake Mariner is converting contracted capacity into recurring revenue, and the company added another major lease in Kentucky with Anthropic. He emphasized TeraWulf’s model of controlling power-secured infrastructure, contracting with high-quality customers, delivering in phases, and recycling capital into larger opportunities it directly controls. His tone was confident and strategic, but he repeatedly stressed discipline, power control, and execution certainty over pure growth for growth’s sake.
Patrick Fleury focused on the financial profile shifting toward long-duration contracted HPC revenue. He highlighted the $44.8 million of Q2 revenue, the 52% jump in HPC lease revenue to $31.9 million, the approximately 28% reported HPC leasing margin and approximately 80% adjusted margin, and the very large noncash Google warrant loss of $755.7 million that drove the GAAP net loss. He also pointed to strong liquidity, including about $3.0 billion of cash and restricted cash, about $1.45 billion of unrestricted parent liquidity after the initial Abernathy payment, and about $1.5 billion of gross cash at WULF Compute net of reserves and construction accounts. On capital allocation, he said current liquidity plus expected Abernathy proceeds should fund remaining Lake Mariner commitments, planned Justified equity, Muskie letter-of-credit needs, Chesapeake, and other new sites without equity issuance, while keeping leverage conservative.
Analysts pressed on utility partnerships, tenant credit quality, pipeline size, labor constraints, political/regulatory risk, and financing. Management said utility partners such as Kentucky Power are effectively solving for load and generation separately, while TeraWulf focuses on transmission commitments, energy backstops, and credit support; they also said the company prefers direct deals with high-quality counterparties and expects tenant diversification over time. On pipeline and execution, management said 250 to 500 megawatts annually is the current operating bound because labor, contractor capacity, and financing are real constraints, though it sees strong demand for later-year capacity, especially around Muskie. On financing, Patrick said future projects will follow a project-finance style structure with conservative leverage rather than being 95% to 100% levered, and that Hawesville and Muskie will likely be financed in debt markets, with Muskie likely in the first half of next year.
The call showed visible progress: CB-3 is online, CB-4 remains on track for late-September delivery, and CB-5 is moving toward early-January energization. Management also pointed to major expansion catalysts, including the Anthropic lease, Muskie’s utility-backed growth path, and Chesapeake regulatory approval, while saying the balance sheet and Abernathy proceeds should cover near-term funding needs without equity dilution.
The company is still dealing with heavy execution complexity, including constrained electrical labor, evolving tenant design requirements, and updated capital costs of about $9.1 million per megawatt. Reported margins were well below the long-term target because of pre-revenue operating and development costs, and the quarter included a large $755.7 million noncash warrant loss that drove the GAAP loss. Management also acknowledged that power availability, interconnection timing, and regulatory scrutiny could cause fits and starts across the industry.
AI summary of the company's earnings call · Paraphrased · Not investment advice
- Free Float
- 77.3%
- Shares Outstanding
- 495.53M
- Float Shares
- 383.08M
of shares held by institutions
520 13F filers
Buy/sell ratio 1.25. Sells can include pre-scheduled 10b5-1 plan sales, not just discretionary selling.
Top institutional holders
Largest 13F positions, with quarter-over-quarter change.
| Holder | Shares | Δ Quarter |
|---|---|---|
| Vanguard Group Inc | 33.64M | ▲ 9.16M |
| Lone Pine Capital LLC | 24.14M | ▲ 4.22M |
| Blackrock, Inc. | 23.39M | ▼ 4.75M |
| Vanguard Capital Management LLC | 17.90M | ▲ 2.27M |
| Fmr LLC | 14.44M | ▲ 9.65M |
| Value Aligned Research Advisors, LLC | 12.26M | ▲ 4.41M |
| Morgan Stanley | 11.89M | ▲ 5.96M |
| Two Sigma Investments, LP | 11.50M | ▲ 3.66M |
| Geode Capital Management, LLC | 7.92M | ▼ 607.72K |
| Scoggin Management LP | 7.83M | ▲ 325.00K |
| Invesco Ltd. | 7.11M | ▲ 3.08M |
| Citadel Advisors LLC | 7.10M | ▲ 4.27M |
Held by 353 ETFs
Biggest fund positions in WULF by dollar value.
Recent insider transactions
Who's buying, who's selling, and how much.
| Date | Insider | Type | Shares |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 26 | Bucella Michael C. | buy | 2,860 |
| Aug 14, 26 | Bucella Michael C. | buy | 3,023 |
| Aug 16, 26 | Tanimoto William Joseph | other | 6,666 |
| Aug 16, 26 | Tanimoto William Joseph | other | 6,666 |
| Aug 1, 26 | Langlais Kerri M. | other | 500,000 |
| Aug 3, 26 | Langlais Kerri M. | sell | 276,500 |
| Aug 1, 26 | Langlais Kerri M. | other | 500,000 |
| Aug 1, 26 | Fleury Patrick | other | 500,000 |
| Aug 1, 26 | Fleury Patrick | other | 500,000 |
| Jun 29, 26 | Prager Paul B. | sell | 137,500 |
A “Sell” may be a pre-scheduled 10b5-1 plan sale rather than a discretionary decision — read insider selling with that in mind.
Our WULF coverage
Recent articles, reports, and earnings notes.

TeraWulf (WULF): AI Power Ramp Meets Heavy Leverage
TeraWulf is transitioning from bitcoin mining to contracted HPC leasing, with 60 MW already online at Lake Mariner and more capacity slated for 2026. The opportunity is real, but so are the losses, leverage, and valuation risk.

What to Watch as Blockfusion Digital Infrastructure’s SPAC Merger Heads to a Vote
Blockfusion Digital Infrastructure is going public through a SPAC merger with Blue Acquisition Corp. (NYSE: BACC), with the deal still pending as of the latest SEC filing. The setup is attractive if the Niagara AI/HPC buildout lands financing, but shareholders should watch redemption risk, dilution, and whether the capital stack actually closes.

TeraWulf is not a Bitcoin miner anymore, and the market still has not caught up
TeraWulf is being priced with bitcoin-miner baggage even after landing a 20-year Anthropic lease tied to roughly $19 billion of contracted revenue. The story has shifted toward AI infrastructure ownership, and the market still looks early to that re-rating.
Want a deeper read on WULF?
Generate a full analyst-grade report — bull/bear case, price targets, valuation depth, and a complete financial breakdown.
Anthropic in ETFs: How Investors Can Gain Exposure
etftrends.com · Aug 20
Here's why TeraWulf, CoreWeave, and Nebius stocks are falling
invezz.com · Aug 19
TeraWulf: The Thesis Is Stronger Now
seekingalpha.com · Aug 19
TeraWulf Stock Falls as Inflation Fears Squeeze Growth Stocks
benzinga.com · Aug 18
Neocloud Stocks Plummet on Rising Overspend Fears. CoreWeave Down 7%, Nebius Down 5%, Terawulf Down 6%
247wallst.com · Aug 18
Cipher Mining Falls 9%, TeraWulf Sinks 7% as Rising Yields Hit the AI Miner Pivot
247wallst.com · Aug 18
TeraWulf Powers On With New Tenant, Anthropic, Despite Capex/Debt Risks
seekingalpha.com · Aug 14
The Future of AI Investing: Harbor Debuts 5 New Ecosystem ETFs
etftrends.com · Aug 13
Headlines from third-party outlets — TickerSpark isn't affiliated with these sources.
AI analysis · Last refreshed August 16, 2026 · Live quote · Not investment advice