A mix of firm growth, rising inflation expectations and hawkish Fed commentary pushed markets toward a higher-for-longer rate outlook. Low jobless claims and stronger PMI data showed resilience, but record-low consumer sentiment and surging input prices revived stagflation fears.
Last week’s data and Fed commentary reinforced a higher-for-longer rate backdrop, with inflation expectations rising even as growth held up. For investors, that means rate cuts are no longer the base case, keeping pressure on bonds, housing, and other rate-sensitive assets.
Last week’s economic data told a blunt story: the U.S. economy still had pockets of strength, but inflation pressure kept leaking into places the Fed could not ignore. Jobless claims stayed low at 209K. Building permits jumped to 1.442M. The Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow estimate rose to 4.3% for Q2. Yet that was only half the picture. The University of Michigan’s final May survey showed year-ahead inflation expectations climbed to 4.8%, while consumer sentiment fell to a record low 44.8. S&P Global’s May PMI held at 51.7, but price gauges surged and services barely stayed above stall speed. Put it together, and the week looked less like a clean soft landing and more like an economy still moving forward with inflation riding in the passenger seat.
That tension shaped markets. Treasury yields stayed elevated after a sharp weekly backup, the dollar held firm, and rate-sensitive areas such as housing stocks remained under pressure. Fed officials added to that tone. The minutes from the April 28-29 FOMC meeting showed a committee that was in no rush to cut. Then Governor Christopher Waller sharpened the message by arguing the Fed should remove its easing bias and by saying a future hike could not be ruled out if inflation failed to cool. In plain English, last week pushed investors away from the easy idea that rate cuts were the default next move.
Key Events Recap
The biggest macro theme was the return of a stagflation debate. Growth data did not collapse. Labor data did not crack. Housing data even showed some resilience. However, inflation expectations, input costs, and Fed rhetoric all moved in a more hawkish direction. That mix mattered because it kept the higher-for-longer rate story alive.
The FOMC minutes, released May 20, set the tone early. The minutes from the April 28-29 meeting showed that a majority of participants said some policy firming would likely become appropriate if inflation kept running persistently above 2%. That was a hawkish read. Markets took it as confirmation that the Fed was not leaning toward near-term easing. Front-end Treasury pricing stayed under pressure, the dollar found support, and rate-sensitive equities faced another reminder that lower rates were not arriving on schedule. The message was simple enough: the bar for cuts remained high, and the bar for keeping policy tight stayed low.
Waller’s May 22 speech reinforced that message and then some. Reuters-linked coverage said he wanted the Fed to remove its “easing bias” from the statement. He also said a rate cut was no more likely than a rate increase and tied the risk to the inflation shock from the Iran war and higher energy prices. He pointed to April PCE inflation at 3.8%, with price pressure broadening across goods and services. Markets treated that as a meaningful hawkish repricing signal. The practical effect was clear: June and the next few meetings no longer looked like a one-way path toward cuts. When one of the Fed’s more policy-relevant voices starts talking this way, traders tend to stop daydreaming about easy money.
Waller said the Fed should remove its “easing bias” and that a rate cut is no more likely than a rate hike.
The University of Michigan’s final May survey then gave the hawks fresh ammunition. Year-ahead inflation expectations rose to 4.8%, above the 4.5% estimate and up from 4.7% previously. More striking, consumer sentiment was revised down to 44.8 from the preliminary 48.2, marking a record low. Long-run inflation expectations also moved up to 3.9% from 3.4% in the preliminary reading. That combination mattered far more than a standard confidence miss. Weak sentiment alone can be shrugged off. Weak sentiment combined with rising inflation expectations is harder to dismiss because it hints that households are internalizing higher prices rather than treating them as a temporary shock.
Analysts described that mix as stagflationary, and the label fit. Goldman Sachs highlighted the downward revision in sentiment and the rise in inflation expectations. Markets read the report as another reason the Fed would stay cautious. Bond-market pressure remained tied to oil, geopolitics, and sticky inflation fears. The survey also lined up with the broader inflation backdrop in market pricing. Daily inflation-rate readings in the background data hovered around 2.4% in late May, but the Michigan survey showed households felt more heat than that headline calm implied.
Thursday’s S&P Global flash PMI added another layer to the same story. The Composite PMI held at 51.7, matching April and slightly beating the 51.5 estimate. On the surface, that said the economy was still expanding. Under the hood, the split was more revealing. Manufacturing rose to 55.3 from 54.5, while services slipped to 50.9 from 51.0. More important, factory input prices jumped to 79.5 and overall business input prices hit 64.0, both multi-year highs. Output prices also stayed elevated. That is not the profile of an economy gliding into disinflation.
Chris Williamson’s commentary cut through the noise. He argued the economy might struggle to manage much more than 1% annualized GDP growth in Q2, even as price pressure re-accelerated. Markets treated the report as stagflationary rather than outright bullish. Equities stayed under pressure intraday, the dollar remained firm, and the PMI did little to cool rate fears. The manufacturing strength also came with an asterisk. Part of the gain reflected inventory building and safety-stock behavior tied to supply and price worries around the Iran conflict. That is useful activity in the short run, but it is not the same thing as clean end-demand strength.
The regional factory data backed up that caution. The Philadelphia Fed Manufacturing Index collapsed to -0.4 in May from 26.7 in April, badly missing the 18 estimate. That was a sharp swing from strong expansion to slight contraction. The Kansas City Fed Manufacturing Production Index slipped to 9 from 10, matching expectations, while the broader Kansas Fed composite index stood at 8. In other words, national manufacturing data looked solid, but regional surveys showed a much less even picture. Factories were not rolling over across the board, yet momentum was clearly fragile.
Markets did not treat the Philly Fed miss as enough to overturn the broader higher-for-longer story. It was mildly supportive for Treasuries on growth grounds, but inflation and Fed rhetoric remained the dominant forces. That contrast mattered. A weak regional survey can help bonds for a few hours. It does far less when inflation expectations are rising and Fed officials are openly discussing the removal of easing bias.
Labor data stayed firm. Initial jobless claims for the week ended May 16 came in at 209K, down from 212K and just below the 210K estimate. Continuing claims rose modestly to 1.782M from 1.776M, but still came in below the 1.790M estimate. Reuters-framed coverage described the report as evidence of labor-market resilience, and that was the right read. Claims remained low enough to show layoffs were contained. At the same time, the small rise in continuing claims kept alive the idea that rehiring had slowed. That is a cooler labor market, not a broken one.
Market reaction was muted because the data fit the existing narrative rather than changing it. Stocks were slightly red, the dollar was firmer, and Treasury yields eased off intraday highs. The claims data did not create a recession scare. Instead, they gave the Fed more room to focus on inflation. That is the key point. When jobless claims sit near 209K, policymakers do not have much cover to pivot dovishly.
Housing data were mixed, but sturdier than the rate backdrop would have implied. April housing starts came in at 1.465M, down 2.8% month over month from 1.507M, but above the 1.41M estimate. Building permits rose to 1.442M from 1.363M, a 5.8% monthly gain that crushed the 0.5% estimate on a percentage basis and beat the 1.39M level on the headline count. Pending home sales also improved. April pending sales rose 1.4% month over month and 3.2% year over year, beating expectations and showing that buyers were still active despite high financing costs.
The details mattered. Single-family permits fell to 872K and single-family starts dropped to 927K, while multifamily activity stayed much stronger. NAHB’s Housing Market Index rose to 37 from 34, above the 35 estimate, but builder sentiment still sat in soft territory. Builders cited higher mortgage rates, rising gas prices, war-related uncertainty, and elevated construction costs. That left housing in a familiar spot: not collapsing, but still highly rate-sensitive. Multifamily looked like the relative bright spot, while single-family remained squeezed by affordability.
Markets connected that housing story to the bond selloff. The 30-year mortgage rate rose to 6.51% on May 21 from 6.36% a week earlier, while the 15-year rate climbed to 5.85% from 5.71%. MBA data also showed the 30-year conforming contract rate at 6.46% for the prior survey week, with mortgage applications up 1.7% and purchase applications up 4%. Meanwhile, Reuters reported the 10-year Treasury yield had climbed 23 basis points in a week and traded around 4.62% on May 21 after touching 4.69% earlier in the week, the highest since January 2025. Convexity hedging by mortgage investors added fuel to that move. Housing stocks felt the strain, with the PHLX Housing index down 3.3% on the prior Friday.
There was also a split between survey growth and hard-data growth that kept economists busy. The Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow estimate for Q2 rose to 4.2573% annualized on May 21, up from 4.0%. That is a strong nowcast by any standard. Yet it sat awkwardly beside the PMI commentary pointing to growth closer to 1%. The gap is not as strange as it looks. GDPNow can be lifted by trade, inventories, and consumption inputs even when business surveys soften. Still, the divergence mattered because it argued against a clean macro narrative. Hard data still looked firm. Soft data looked more worried. The Fed, unsurprisingly, leaned toward caution.
The Fed’s balance sheet was a quieter part of the week, but still worth noting. The H.4.1 data for the week ended May 20 showed the balance sheet at 6.714T, down from 6.728T in the summary series. More detailed figures showed Reserve Bank credit at $6.667T, securities held outright at $6.436T, Treasury securities at $4.453T, and mortgage-backed securities at $1.981T. Weekly changes were small: Reserve Bank credit fell by $5.7B, Treasury holdings rose by $9.3B, and MBS declined by $0.5B. The takeaway was steady rather than dramatic. Quantitative tightening remained in place, but there was no sign of a sudden liquidity squeeze. For markets, that meant the balance sheet stayed a background issue, not the main event.
Two smaller releases rounded out the picture. Net long-term TIC flows for March came in at $81.3B, up from $57B previously, while the broader net TIC inflow reached $150.7B. That pointed to solid foreign demand for U.S. assets, led by private inflows. It was not a headline market mover, but it did show that overseas capital was still helping absorb U.S. issuance. Meanwhile, the NAHB index and pending home sales both hinted that housing demand had not frozen, even with mortgage rates back above 6.5%. That resilience mattered because it kept the economy from looking fragile enough to force the Fed’s hand.
Wrap-Up
The past week revealed an economy that still had enough momentum to keep the Fed on guard. Claims at 209K showed labor resilience. Permits at 1.442M and pending home sales up 1.4% showed housing had not folded. GDPNow at 4.3% showed hard data still carried weight. But the inflation side of the ledger kept getting worse. Michigan year-ahead inflation expectations rose to 4.8%. PMI price gauges hit multi-year highs. Waller turned hawkish, and the FOMC minutes kept hikes on the table if inflation stayed too hot.
That combination left markets with an uncomfortable but clear message. The economy was not weak enough to force cuts, and inflation was not soft enough to permit them. For investors, that kept the focus on rate sensitivity, pricing power, and balance-sheet discipline. TickerSpark’s mission is built around that kind of market moment: cutting through noise, anchoring to facts, and turning a messy week of macro headlines into actionable perspective. Last week’s lesson was simple. Growth survived. Inflation lingered. The Fed noticed.
▌Common Questions
Frequently asked questions
+Why are Fed rate cuts on hold right now?
Recent data showed inflation expectations rising while growth and labor market readings remained firm, giving the Fed little urgency to ease. Fed officials also signaled they are not ready to shift toward cuts until inflation shows clearer progress toward 2%.
+What did the latest FOMC minutes signal to markets?
The minutes showed a committee that is still focused on inflation and not leaning toward near-term easing. Markets interpreted that as confirmation that policy will stay restrictive for longer.
+How did inflation expectations affect the market outlook?
The University of Michigan survey showed year-ahead inflation expectations rising to 4.8%, which reinforced fears that price pressures are becoming more persistent. That made investors less confident that the Fed can cut rates soon without risking renewed inflation.
+Which parts of the market are most sensitive to this hawkish Fed shift?
Treasuries, the dollar, housing stocks, and other rate-sensitive sectors are the most directly affected by a higher-for-longer policy outlook. Elevated yields and delayed cuts tend to pressure valuations in those areas.
▌The Daily Briefing · Free
A new stock idea, every evening.
One stock worth watching each weekday, plus the analysis behind it. Free, in your inbox.
