Kolibri Global Energy Inc.
Built from real-time financials, refreshed daily. For a full Analyst Grade with bull/bear case, price targets, and qualitative risk analysis, generate a KGEI research report →
Price Chart
About the company
Headquartered in Thousand Oaks, California, Kolibri Global Energy Inc. is a U. S.
- CEO
- Wolf E. Regener
- IPO
- 2010
- Employees
- 8
- HQ
- Thousand Oaks, CA, US
Get TickerSpark's AI analysis on KGEI
Create an account to generate AI analysis on any ticker — technical setup, analyst consensus, earnings watch, insider pulse, financial health, and peer context. Ready in about a minute.
Get Pro Access →Already have an account? Log in
Similar companies
Peers in the same neighborhood.
- Market Cap
- $216.99M
- P/E
- 11.21
- Fwd P/E
- 8.83
- PEG
- 0.11
- P/S
- 3.00
- P/B
- 1.00
- EV/EBITDA
- 5.39
- Div Yield
- 0.00%
- Gross Margin
- 62.97%
- Op Margin
- 51.34%
- Net Margin
- 26.85%
- ROE
- 9.33%
- ROIC
- 9.94%
Latest fiscal year · YoY change
- Revenue
- $57.85M-22.4%
- Gross Profit
- $31.00M-9.9%
- Op Income
- $23.43M
- Net Income
- $15.75M-13.1%
- EPS
- $0.44-13.7%
- OCF Growth
- +8.3%
- FCF Growth
- -383.1%
- 52W High
- $6.61
- 52W Low
- $3.35
- 50D MA
- $5.15
- 200D MA
- $4.70
- Beta
- 1.49
- RSI (14)
- 68
- Avg Volume
- 191.95K
Earnings call summaries
Pick a quarter — each call distilled into takeaways, results, and a bull vs bear read.
Kolibri Global Energy reported record quarterly revenue, production and adjusted EBITDA in Q2 2026, with stronger cash flow despite temporary shut-ins and higher operating costs.· August 13, 2026
- Q2 revenue hit a company record of $22.5 million, up 109% year over year.
- Average production rose 46% to 4,690 BOE/d, driving record adjusted EBITDA of $16.4 million.
- Net income was $8.5 million, or $0.24 basic EPS, versus $2.9 million and $0.08 a year ago.
- Borrowing base was increased 15% to $75 million from $65 million, giving more liquidity flexibility.
- Management said the 4 new 2026 wells should add production, with 4Q expected to be the strongest quarter of the year.
Second-quarter 2026 revenue was $22.5 million, up 109% from the prior-year quarter, with average production up 46% to 4,690 BOE/d from 3,220 BOE/d. Net income was $8.5 million and basic EPS was $0.24, versus $2.9 million and $0.08 in Q2 2025. Adjusted EBITDA was $16.4 million, up 114% year over year from $7.7 million, and netback from operations rose 48% to $43.92 per BOE from $29.66. Production and operating expense averaged $8.90 per BOE, up from $7.15 in the prior quarter. For year-to-date June, net revenue was $42.1 million, average production was 4,688 BOE/d, net income was $12.5 million and basic EPS was $0.35, and adjusted EBITDA was $31.3 million. The credit facility borrowing base was redetermined upward 15% to $75 million from $65 million. Management did not provide a full updated numerical guide on the call, but said the 4 new wells in the 2026 drilling program are expected to contribute most in the fourth quarter, and that 3Q should be the low-production quarter while 4Q should be the high-production quarter for the year.
Wolf Regener was emphatic that the quarter was the best in company history on revenue, production and adjusted EBITDA, and said he was “very pleased” with the results. He highlighted completion of the 3 Clifton Mack wells, the start of the Lovina 8-5-1HF well as the first False Caney test, and said a successful False Caney result could open up more locations, reserves and value creation. His tone was upbeat but cautious on guidance, repeatedly declining to speculate beyond the company’s stated outlook.
Gary Johnson focused on the financial lift from higher production and pricing, noting Q2 revenue of $22.5 million, 109% growth, and average production of 4,690 BOE/d, up 46%. He said net income increased to $8.5 million, adjusted EBITDA to $16.4 million, and netback to $43.92 per BOE, while operating expense rose to $8.90 per BOE because of workover costs and temporarily higher water hauling costs. On the balance sheet, he highlighted the borrowing base increase to $75 million from $65 million and said that should provide more working-capital flexibility as growth continues.
Analysts pressed management on why production stayed strong despite shut-ins and no new volumes in the first half; Regener said the wells performed well, gas compression tied into gas lift helped boost output, and the company will see normal decline before new wells add back growth. Questions on the Lovina/False Caney test centered on risk and comparability to the Caney; Regener said the zone is thinner but the area is geologically favorable, the 2-mile lateral should help economics, and success would be measured by flow rates and decline behavior. Management also said the Alicia Renee shut-ins were driven by redesigning programs around nearby faults, not a performance problem, and expects some flush production when they come back online.
The call showed strong underlying operating momentum: record revenue, production, and adjusted EBITDA, plus a higher borrowing base. Management believes the 2026 drilling program should add meaningful growth in the fourth quarter, and it sounded optimistic that the False Caney test could create additional repeatable inventory and reserve upside if the well performs well.
Costs moved higher, with production and operating expense at $8.90 per BOE versus $7.15 in the prior quarter, due to workover and water hauling costs, and management acknowledged some broader chemical cost inflation. Production guidance still depends heavily on the four new wells, and management said 4Q is expected to be the strongest quarter, which implies near-term quarterly volatility and reliance on execution. The False Caney is an unproven test, and management repeatedly said the key risks are flow rates, decline rates, and whether the result is repeatable.
AI summary of the company's earnings call · Paraphrased · Not investment advice
- Free Float
- 86.6%
- Shares Outstanding
- 35.63M
- Float Shares
- 30.85M
of shares held by institutions
63 13F filers
Top institutional holders
Largest 13F positions, with quarter-over-quarter change.
| Holder | Shares | Δ Quarter |
|---|---|---|
| Tfg Asset Management Gp Ltd | 6.83M | 0 |
| Blackrock, Inc. | 1.70M | ▲ 34.08K |
| Toronto Dominion Bank | 800.00K | ▼ 54 |
| Ubs Group AG | 712.53K | ▼ 320.61K |
| Geode Capital Management, LLC | 430.91K | ▲ 41.24K |
| Bank Of America Corp | 383.03K | ▲ 10.29K |
| State Street Corp | 340.00K | ▲ 43.50K |
| Citigroup Inc | 318.54K | ▲ 12.21K |
| Natixis | 200.00K | 0 |
| Vanguard Group Inc | 186.32K | ▲ 5.76K |
| Marshall Wace, Llp | 183.81K | ▲ 86.80K |
| Northern Trust Corp | 165.68K | ▲ 7.02K |
Held by 16 ETFs
Biggest fund positions in KGEI by dollar value.
Our KGEI coverage
Recent articles, reports, and earnings notes.
No research on KGEI yet
For a full analyst-grade research report — grades, price targets, financials, chart analysis — generate one on demand.
Generate KGEI report →Kolibri Global Energy Inc. (KEI:CA) Q2 2026 Earnings Call Transcript
seekingalpha.com · Aug 13
Kolibri Global Energy Q2 Earnings Call Highlights
marketbeat.com · Aug 13
Kolibri Global Energy Inc. (KGEI) Q2 Earnings and Revenues Beat Estimates
zacks.com · Aug 13
Kolibri Global Energy Inc. Announces Another Record for Its Highest Quarterly Revenue of $22.5 Million With a 46% Production Increase and a 197% Net Income Increase for the Second Quarter of 2026
businesswire.com · Aug 13
Kolibri Global Energy Maps Oklahoma Shale Growth, Buybacks and Takeover Potential
marketbeat.com · Jul 15
Is Kolibri Global Energy Inc. (KGEI) Outperforming Other Oils-Energy Stocks This Year?
zacks.com · Jul 3
Kolibri Global Energy: Stepping On The Gas Pedal For Growth
seekingalpha.com · Jul 1
Kolibri Global Energy Inc. Provides Strategy Update and Higher 2026 Forecast
businesswire.com · Jun 29
Headlines from third-party outlets — TickerSpark isn't affiliated with these sources.