Technip Energies N.V.
Built from real-time financials, refreshed daily. For a full Analyst Grade with bull/bear case, price targets, and qualitative risk analysis, generate a THNPF research report →
Price Chart
About the company
Headquartered in Nanterre, France, and founded in 2019, Technip Energies N. V. is a global engineering and technology firm driving the energy transition.
- CEO
- Arnaud Pieton
- IPO
- 2021
- Employees
- 18,574
- HQ
- Nanterre, HF, FR
Get TickerSpark's AI analysis on THNPF
Create an account to generate AI analysis on any ticker — technical setup, analyst consensus, earnings watch, insider pulse, financial health, and peer context. Ready in about a minute.
Get Pro Access →Already have an account? Log in
Similar companies
Peers in the same neighborhood.
- Market Cap
- $5.92B
- P/E
- 12.02
- Fwd P/E
- 17.13
- PEG
- -0.51
- P/S
- 0.48
- P/B
- 2.59
- EV/EBITDA
- 6.62
- Div Yield
- 3.31%
- Gross Margin
- 6.02%
- Op Margin
- 3.88%
- Net Margin
- 4.05%
- ROE
- 19.91%
- ROIC
- 7.43%
Latest fiscal year · YoY change
- Revenue
- $7.20B+7.2%
- Gross Profit
- $963.84M+5.0%
- Op Income
- $463.63M
- Net Income
- $363.56M-6.9%
- EPS
- $2.07-6.3%
- OCF Growth
- -21.8%
- FCF Growth
- -24.9%
- 52W High
- $49.00
- 52W Low
- $34.18
- 50D MA
- $38.00
- 200D MA
- $40.08
- Beta
- 0.58
- RSI (14)
- 1
- Avg Volume
- 70
Earnings call summaries
Pick a quarter — each call distilled into takeaways, results, and a bull vs bear read.
Technip Energies posted stable first-half revenue and record backlog, but Middle East disruptions cut Project Delivery margins and led to a lower full-year margin outlook.· July 30, 2026
- Revenue was stable year-over-year at EUR 3.7 billion, but recurring EBITDA fell about one-third to EUR 212 million because of Middle East-related operational issues and higher costs.
- Order intake was exceptionally strong at EUR 12.7 billion, lifting backlog to EUR 25 billion and giving management visibility through the end of the decade.
- Project Delivery was the main pressure point: segment EBITDA fell 45% to EUR 118 million and margin dropped to 4.3%, down 350 bps.
- TPS held up well, with margin rising to 15.4% and guidance for TPS margin raised by 50 bps.
- Shareholder returns remained a priority, with the EUR 150 million buyback completed and 2026 capital returns expected to total around EUR 300 million.
First-half revenues were EUR 3.7 billion, described as stable or marginally higher year-over-year. Group EBITDA was EUR 212 million, and recurring EBITDA was around 1/3 lower year-over-year. In Project Delivery, segment revenue was EUR 2.8 billion, up 1% year-over-year, while adjusted recurring EBITDA declined 45% to EUR 118 million and EBITDA margin was 4.3%, down 350 bps. In TPS, revenue was 2% lower year-over-year, but recurring EBITDA margin improved to 15.4%, up 30 bps. Order intake was EUR 12.7 billion and backlog reached EUR 25 billion, with PD backlog at EUR 23.5 billion and TPS backlog close to EUR 1.5 billion. Free cash flow conversion excluding working capital and provisions was 86%, actual free cash flow was EUR 183 million, gross cash rose to EUR 4.8 billion, and economic net cash was more than EUR 900 million. For full-year guidance, management lowered Project Delivery margin guidance to 5% plus, maintained the revenue outlook, raised TPS margin guidance by 50 bps, and guided to an effective tax rate of 30% to 32% and corporate costs of EUR 65 million to EUR 70 million.
Arnaud Pieton said the quarter showed a company facing a difficult operating environment but still executing strongly commercially, with a record backlog and broadening demand outside the Middle East. He emphasized cost recovery, contractual protections, and diversification, saying around 75% of awards over the last 24 months came from outside the Middle East. His tone was cautious on 2026 profitability but confident that the portfolio supports a meaningful recovery in 2027 and the longer-term margin trajectory.
Bruno Vibert focused on the financial impact of the Middle East disruption and the underlying balance-sheet strength. He highlighted EUR 212 million of group EBITDA, 86% free cash conversion excluding working capital and provisions, EUR 183 million of free cash flow, and gross cash of EUR 4.8 billion, plus economic net cash of more than EUR 900 million. He said Project Delivery’s lower profitability reflected disputed items and incremental logistics, safety and continuity costs, estimated at around EUR 30 million to EUR 40 million per quarter, while TPS delivered 15.4% margin and higher guidance. He also noted a EUR 500 million bond issuance for general corporate purposes and a 2026 corporate cost outlook of EUR 65 million to EUR 70 million.
Analysts focused heavily on Middle East cost recovery, the size of the provisions, and whether the 2026 margin cut was conservative. Management said some customers have already signed off on cost recovery, but most of the assumed recovery was not yet recognized because the mechanisms were not formally in place; Arnaud said the majority of the cost should be recoverable, but they were being deliberately nonspeculative. Questions also probed logistics through the Strait of Hormuz, with management saying a minority of shipments may still go through the strait while most will use alternative routes, and that current guidance assumes conditions stay roughly unchanged through year-end. On backlog and 2027, management said the portfolio still supports the EUR 800 million EBITDA framework for 2028, but it was too early to give 2027 guidance.
The main positive is that commercial momentum remained very strong despite the operational disruption, with EUR 12.7 billion of first-half orders and EUR 25 billion of backlog. Management also pointed to balance-sheet strength, EUR 4.8 billion of gross cash, and strong cash conversion, which they said gives flexibility for growth and shareholder returns. They also argued that diversification away from the Middle East is working and that the portfolio still supports a longer-term recovery.
The obvious risk is that Middle East disruption is still hurting profitability, and management admitted logistical challenges persist and recovery timing depends on ongoing discussions. Project Delivery margins were hit hard, and the 2026 outlook was cut to 5% plus, with management acknowledging some cost recovery may not be recognized until agreements are signed. There is also uncertainty around the timing of shipments and the phasing of major Middle East projects, which could affect both 2026 execution and the pace of recovery into 2027.
AI summary of the company's earnings call · Paraphrased · Not investment advice
- Free Float
- 72.3%
- Shares Outstanding
- 173.21M
- Float Shares
- 125.26M
Our THNPF coverage
Recent articles, reports, and earnings notes.
No research on THNPF yet
For a full analyst-grade research report — grades, price targets, financials, chart analysis — generate one on demand.
Generate THNPF report →Technip Energies, Safran, Airbus, Tereos to form green jet fuel venture in France
reuters.com · Jun 9
Technip Energies wins Mozambique LNG contract for Eni, partners
reuters.com · Jun 8
Technip Energies gets go-ahead for over 1-billion-euro US contract
reuters.com · May 15
Voting results of the 2026 Annual General Meeting of Technip Energies
globenewswire.com · May 5
Technip Energies N.V. (THNPY) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript
seekingalpha.com · Apr 30
Technip Energies trims 2026 outlook as Hormuz disruption delays revenue
reuters.com · Apr 30
Technip Energies: I'm Buying The Contractor Everyone Needs
seekingalpha.com · Apr 16
Weekly report share buyback from March 18 to March 20, 2026
globenewswire.com · Mar 23
Headlines from third-party outlets — TickerSpark isn't affiliated with these sources.