Jason Simpkins of Power & Profits is pitching The Galactic Supply Chain. We trace the three Pentagon-linked space stocks behind it and test the claims.
One promotion, several names — all of them point to the same pitch, and the same stock.
“The Pentagon Already Picked the Winners” is the headline attached to Jason Simpkins’ Power & Profits report, “The Galactic Supply Chain: 3 Stocks to Own for Generational Wealth.” The pitch says three public companies sit at the intersection of space, missile defense and a booming Pentagon budget.
The promise is familiar: paying customers, recurring revenue, enormous government contracts and one company with a roughly $2.2 billion backlog. The offer is for the first 100 readers who say yes today. We identify the three-stock basket below, with 92 out of 100 confidence.
The giveaway clues are unusually specific. One company is said to have a roughly $50 billion market value, a $2.2 billion backlog and more launch contracts signed in three months than during all of 2025. Another is linked to Starlab, the planned commercial space station intended to replace the International Space Station, as well as missile-defense work. The third supposedly won both a $1.45 billion hypersonic-testing award and a $446.8 million missile-warning ground-network contract.
The same pitch is also branded as “The Galactic Supply Chain,” “Galactic Supply Chain Portfolio” and “Galactic Supply Chain.” Those names refer to the same promotion, not separate discoveries.
The headline pick is Rocket Lab USA Inc. (RKLB). Its roughly $46.5 billion market value rounds neatly to the promotion’s “about $50 billion” anchor, while its first-quarter 2026 results and earnings call put total backlog at approximately $2.2 billion. Rocket Lab also said it booked 31 Electron and HASTE launches plus five Neutron contracts in that quarter, more launch contracts than it booked during all of 2025. That combination is too distinctive to be coincidence.
The rest of the basket is Voyager Technologies and Kratos Defense & Security Solutions. Voyager’s FY2025 Form 10-K describes Starlab as a Voyager-led, majority-owned joint venture developing a commercial station for the post-ISS era. Its filings also tie the company to propulsion and defense work supporting Golden Dome and Next Generation Interceptor programs, though the latter role is a subcontract rather than responsibility for building the entire missile shield.
Kratos matches the two award clues almost exactly. Its announcement describes the five-year, $1.45 billion MACH-TB 2.0 contract for hypersonic systems engineering, integration and testing, while a Space Systems Command announcement identifies Kratos on the separate $446.8 million missile-warning and missile-tracking ground-network agreement. Rocket Lab is the anchor; Voyager and Kratos fill the smaller defense-and-space slots.
The claim-by-claim check below separates what the companies’ SEC filings, contract announcements and market data support from what the promotion stretches, compresses or leaves unverified. The strongest evidence is in Rocket Lab’s FY2025 Form 10-K and first-quarter 2026 disclosures, Voyager’s FY2025 filing, Kratos’ FY2025 filing and the relevant Space Force announcements.
| The promotion claims | Verdict | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| The pitch centers on three small publicly traded companies | Overstated | Recent market data put Rocket Lab at about $46.5 billion, versus roughly $2.0 billion for Voyager and $9.2 billion for Kratos, making two small names and one large anchor rather than three small companies. |
| The three companies have paying customers | Checks out | Rocket Lab's FY2025 Form 10-K names NASA, DARPA, the NRO and commercial operators as customers, while Voyager and Kratos reported substantial FY2025 revenue from defense and space customers. |
Get AI research on any stock
Instant reports, daily intelligence, and an AI analyst in your pocket.
The offer says the first 100 readers must say yes today. We received this campaign on only one day, August 3, 2026, so the record is too thin to judge whether that deadline rolls. There’s no basis here to call it a rolling device, but there’s also no evidence of a deadline tied to an earnings date, agency decision or other checkable event.
Rocket Lab is also being teased under “Beyond SpaceX” by Jon “Dr. J.” Najarian. That means readers encountering both promotions are seeing the same company presented through two different space-investing narratives, rather than two independent discoveries.
The promotion’s central argument is simple: the Pentagon and Space Force are spending heavily on space and missile defense, so three public companies supplying that machinery could create generational wealth. The first link holds. Rocket Lab, Voyager and Kratos all disclose government or defense customers, relevant hardware and exposure to national-security programs. The Space Force and Space Development Agency awards are real, too.
The weakest link is the jump from real programs to “three small companies with recurring revenue and huge signed Pentagon contracts.” Rocket Lab isn’t small at roughly $46.5 billion, and the filings don’t establish a consistent recurring-revenue metric across all three companies. Voyager’s disclosed FY2025 backlog was $265.6 million, and its Next Generation Interceptor work is a subcontract with no disclosed contract value. That is a much smaller footprint than “building the Pentagon’s new missile shield” suggests.
The grand market numbers need trimming as well. The cited roughly $71 billion figure refers to a proposed FY2027 Space Force budget, not a combined annual budget for the Space Force, NRO, DARPA and Missile Defense Agency. McKinsey’s roughly $1.8 trillion space-economy projection is for 2035, not the early 2030s, while its roughly $470 billion figure describes the 2021 market rather than the current one.
As a basket, these are three different bets, not interchangeable winners. Rocket Lab and Kratos carry the strongest evidence behind the Pentagon-spending thesis: Rocket Lab has the standout backlog and launch pipeline, while Kratos has the two precisely matched awards. Voyager has genuine Starlab and defense exposure, but its role is narrower and more dependent on programs still being developed. The companies may merit separate research; the filings don’t justify treating the promotional bundle as a guaranteed wealth machine.
How confident are we? 92 out of 100. We identified Rocket Lab USA Inc. (RKLB) from the promotion's own clues and checked 25 of its claims against filings, earnings calls, ownership records, market data and public reporting. This is our analysis, not the publisher's disclosure — we have no relationship with them.
Knowing which stock it is only gets you halfway. We score RKLB on valuation, profitability, growth, financial health and momentum — and reach our own conclusion, independent of how it was sold to you.
Read the RKLB report →Independent of the promotion — our own numbers, score and analysis.
The analyst-grade research report — charts, grades, valuation, and price targets — in 10 minutes.
| Can't verify |
| The companies' annual reports disclose revenue, long-term contracts and backlog, but they do not establish a consistent recurring-revenue metric for all three companies. |
| The three companies have huge signed Pentagon contracts | Overstated | Rocket Lab and Kratos have disclosed very large government awards, but Voyager's FY2025 filing reports $265.6 million of total backlog and its Next Generation Interceptor work is a subcontract with no disclosed contract value. |
| The three companies build components used by the Pentagon and Space Force | Checks out | Rocket Lab's FY2025 Form 10-K lists spacecraft components, propulsion, avionics and optical systems, while Voyager's and Kratos' filings describe defense and space-system components supplied to U.S. national-security customers. |
| The three companies build sensors used by the Pentagon and Space Force | Checks out | Rocket Lab's FY2025 Form 10-K describes electro-optical and infrared sensor payloads for missile tracking and space-domain awareness, and its Space Force releases identify those sensors in government satellite contracts. |
| The three companies build satellites used by the Pentagon and Space Force | Checks out | Rocket Lab's December 2025 Space Development Agency award covers 18 satellites carrying missile-warning and tracking sensors, and its May 2026 Space Force award covers two GEO satellites. |
| The three companies build spacecraft used by the Pentagon and Space Force | Checks out | Rocket Lab's FY2025 Form 10-K says it designs and manufactures spacecraft and has deployed more than 200 spacecraft, including for government customers, while Voyager and Kratos describe spacecraft and space-vehicle systems for national-security missions. |
| Their products are used by the Pentagon and U.S. Space Force | Checks out | Rocket Lab disclosed Space Force and Space Development Agency satellite awards, and Kratos' FY2025 Form 10-K specifically lists the U.S. Space Force, Space Command, DARPA and other defense agencies as customers. |
| One company has a $2.2 billion backlog | Checks out | Rocket Lab reported approximately $2.2 billion of total backlog in its first-quarter 2026 results and earnings call. |
| That backlog grows every quarter | Can't verify | Rocket Lab reported backlog growth from $1.85 billion at December 31, 2025, to approximately $2.2 billion in the first quarter of 2026, but the available record does not establish growth in every preceding quarter. |
| That same company signed more launch contracts in three months than in all of 2025 | Checks out | Rocket Lab's first-quarter 2026 earnings call said its 31 Electron and HASTE launches plus five Neutron contracts booked more launches in three months than during all of 2025. |
| Another company is building the Pentagon's new missile shield | Overstated | Voyager says its propulsion and defense technologies support Golden Dome and Next Generation Interceptor programs, but its disclosed role is a subsystem subcontractor rather than the builder of the Pentagon's entire missile shield. |
| Another company is building the commercial space station replacing the ISS | Checks out | Voyager's FY2025 Form 10-K describes Starlab as a Voyager-led, majority-owned joint venture developing a commercial space station intended to replace the ISS after its planned 2030 decommissioning. |
| The station company is described as 1/800th the size of SpaceX | Can't verify | Voyager's SEC filing confirms Starlab and its business, and recent market data put Voyager near $2.0 billion, but no Voyager, SEC, NASA or SpaceX source was found using the exact 1/800 comparison. |
| The third company won the Pentagon's $1.45 billion hypersonic-testing contract | Checks out | Kratos announced that it was awarded a five-year, $1.45 billion MACH-TB 2.0 OTA contract for hypersonic systems engineering, integration and testing. |
| The third company won the Space Force's $446.8 million missile-warning ground-network contract | Checks out | Space Systems Command announced a $446.8 million Ground Management and Integration agreement with Kratos for the resilient missile-warning and missile-tracking architecture. |
| The $1.45 billion and $446.8 million awards are a double win for the third company | Checks out | Kratos holds the MACH-TB 2.0 hypersonic-testing award and the separate Space Systems Command ground-management award, so the promotion's double-win description is supported. |
| Two of the three companies have market capitalizations below $10 billion | Checks out | Recent market data put Voyager at approximately $2.0 billion and Kratos at approximately $9.2 billion, both below the $10 billion threshold. |
| The anchor company has a market capitalization of about $50 billion | Checks out | Recent market data put Rocket Lab's market capitalization at approximately $46.5 billion, which reasonably rounds to about $50 billion. |
| The companies are positioned to benefit from U.S. space-program spending | Checks out | Rocket Lab reports government-linked revenue and Space Force and SDA awards, Kratos lists Space Force and defense agencies as customers, and Voyager operates defense, national-security and commercial-space segments. |
| That spending totals $71 billion a year across Space Force, NRO, DARPA and MDA | Contradicted | Space Foundation and Air & Space Forces reporting identify approximately $71 billion as a proposed FY2027 Space Force budget, while the NRO, DARPA and Missile Defense Agency have separate budget figures rather than a combined $71 billion total. |
| The broader space market is currently valued at $470 billion | Contradicted | McKinsey cites approximately $469 billion for the global space economy in 2021 but $630 billion in 2023, so $470 billion is not a current market valuation in the cited source. |
| The broader space market could approach $1.8 trillion by the early 2030s | Overstated | McKinsey projects a $1.8 trillion global space economy by 2035, so the promotion pulls the forecast forward by describing it as an early-2030s outcome. |
Cancel anytime
Rocket Lab has strong revenue growth, a $2.36B backlog, and a credible move into integrated space systems, but the stock already prices in a lot of success. Neutron execution and continued losses keep the rating at Hold.
Jon “Dr. J.” Najarian’s The Market Rebel Report pitches “Beyond SpaceX: Elon’s Next Millionaire Maker.” We identify the company and test its orbital-AI claims against the filings.
Rocket Lab’s latest drop looks disconnected from what the business is becoming. The market is still trading RKLB like a speculative launch name even as defense wins, record revenue, and the Iridium deal push it toward a space infrastructure model.