Evolution Petroleum Corporation
Built from real-time financials, refreshed daily. For a full Analyst Grade with bull/bear case, price targets, and qualitative risk analysis, generate a EPM research report →
Range $4 – $4
Price Chart
About the company
Evolution Petroleum Corporation, an energy company, engages in the development, production, ownership, exploitation, and investment of onshore oil and gas properties in the United States. The company was founded in 2003 and is based in Houston, Texas.
- CEO
- Kelly W. Loyd
- IPO
- 1996
- Employees
- 11
- HQ
- Houston, TX, US
Get TickerSpark's AI analysis on EPM
Create an account to generate AI analysis on any ticker — technical setup, analyst consensus, earnings watch, insider pulse, financial health, and peer context. Ready in about a minute.
Get Pro Access →Already have an account? Log in
Similar companies
Peers in the same neighborhood.
- Market Cap
- $127.17M
- P/E
- -34.07
- Fwd P/E
- 213.00
- PEG
- -0.04
- P/S
- 1.53
- P/B
- 2.07
- EV/EBITDA
- 5.51
- Div Yield
- 13.52%
- Gross Margin
- 20.77%
- Op Margin
- 1.63%
- Net Margin
- -4.36%
- ROE
- -5.44%
- ROIC
- 0.89%
Latest fiscal year · YoY change
- Revenue
- $85.84M-0.0%
- Gross Profit
- $14.51M-23.6%
- Op Income
- $4.17M
- Net Income
- $1.47M-63.9%
- EPS
- $0.03-72.2%
- OCF Growth
- +45.4%
- FCF Growth
- +142.4%
- 52W High
- $5.70
- 52W Low
- $3.19
- 50D MA
- $3.78
- 200D MA
- $4.11
- Beta
- 0.29
- RSI (14)
- 44
- Avg Volume
- 404.22K
Earnings call summaries
Pick a quarter — each call distilled into takeaways, results, and a bull vs bear read.
Evolution Petroleum’s fiscal Q3 was weighed down by weather, gas differentials, and one-time items, but management says those headwinds are temporary and expects a stronger Q4 as volumes and cash flow normalize.· May 13, 2026
- Q3 production was essentially flat year over year at 6,700 BOE/d despite winter storm downtime and disruptions.
- Revenue fell to $20.2 million, down 11% year over year, mainly due to weaker realized prices and a $1.2 million Delhi transportation adjustment.
- Net loss widened to $8.9 million, or $0.26 per diluted share, including $7.6 million of unrealized hedge losses.
- Adjusted EBITDA was $3.1 million versus $7.4 million a year ago; adjusted net loss was $2.9 million versus $0.8 million of adjusted net income last year.
- Management said Q4 should better reflect underlying earnings power, helped by resolution of temporary issues, more TexMex workover gains, and new mineral/royalty volumes.
Fiscal Q3 revenues were $20.2 million, down 11% year over year, with the decline driven by an 11% drop in average realized equivalent prices and production roughly flat at 6,700 BOE/d. Net loss was $8.9 million, or $0.26 per diluted share, versus a net loss of $2.2 million, or $0.07 per diluted share, in the year-ago period. Adjusted EBITDA was $3.1 million versus $7.4 million last year, and adjusted net loss was $2.9 million versus $0.8 million of adjusted net income in the prior-year quarter. Lease operating expenses were $13 million, or $21.49 per BOE, compared with $22.32 per BOE a year ago. Cash on hand was $2.6 million, borrowings were $56.5 million, letters of credit were $0.8 million, and total liquidity was approximately $10.3 million. The board declared a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share, the 51st consecutive quarterly dividend and 16th consecutive dividend at that rate. For Q4, management expects the prior-period Delhi adjustment to be behind them, differentials to normalize, TexMex to be a more meaningful contributor, and mineral/royalty assets to ramp further; they said they expect robust cash flow and more benefit from higher oil and gas prices, while noting at least 30% of crude is still unhedged in the fiscal fourth quarter.
Kelly Loyd framed the quarter as a temporary setback rather than a sign of structural weakness, emphasizing the company’s seven-year effort to build a diversified, capital-efficient portfolio that can sustain free cash flow and the dividend. He pointed to weather-related downtime, gas pricing dislocations, and the Delhi transportation adjustment as nonrecurring issues, and said those items should roll off in Q4. His tone was confident and constructive, with repeated emphasis that the business is designed to withstand difficult quarters and still compound per-share value.
Ryan Stash highlighted the hard numbers: $20.2 million of revenue, $8.9 million of net loss, $3.1 million of adjusted EBITDA, and $13 million of LOE, alongside $2.6 million of cash and $10.3 million of liquidity at March 31, 2026. He said the quarter was hurt by $7.6 million of unrealized hedge losses tied to the spike in crude prices, and that the quarter also reflected regional gas differential weakness, especially at Jonah, plus downtime across several assets. On capital allocation, he said the company paid $4.3 million of dividends during the quarter, continues to add hedges to meet credit facility covenants, and is focused on downside protection while preserving upside; he also noted the balance sheet and asset base support ongoing shareholder returns and selective growth.
Analysts focused on Delhi marketing flexibility, the production run rate into Q4, Texas/New Mexico workovers, the state of non-op and minerals asset pricing, and whether the company would adjust hedging given elevated oil prices. Management said it has flexibility in the Delhi JOA to take production in kind and is actively considering doing so, while also saying GPT charges should be broadly in line historically. On operations, they said storm impacts are largely back online, TexMex workovers should add about 100 net BOE/d by the end of fiscal Q4, and additional SCOOP/STACK and Haynesville/Bossier wells should begin contributing as data comes in, but they declined to quantify near-term upside or speculate on Chaveroo timing or any legal recourse on Delhi. On hedging, Ryan said near-term restructuring options are limited, so the main move is adding 2027 hedges at attractive prices rather than trying to remove existing protection.
The call’s positive case is that the quarter was distorted by temporary issues, while underlying assets and new acquisitions appear to be setting up for a better Q4. Management expects storm-related downtime to normalize, TexMex to ramp, and minerals/royalties to start contributing more meaningfully without adding to capex, while still supporting the dividend.
The main risks discussed were weak realized prices from regional gas differentials, weather-related downtime, and hedge losses that depressed reported results despite stable production. The company also has limited visibility on partner capex and drilling schedules, plus only modest liquidity of $10.3 million and ongoing exposure to commodity and operator execution volatility.
AI summary of the company's earnings call · Paraphrased · Not investment advice
- Free Float
- 87.7%
- Shares Outstanding
- 35.82M
- Float Shares
- 31.40M
of shares held by institutions
124 13F filers
Buy/sell ratio 0.00. Sells can include pre-scheduled 10b5-1 plan sales, not just discretionary selling.
Top institutional holders
Largest 13F positions, with quarter-over-quarter change.
| Holder | Shares | Δ Quarter |
|---|---|---|
| Blackrock, Inc. | 2.42M | ▲ 50.90K |
| Wealthtrust Axiom LLC | 2.21M | ▲ 76.40K |
| Vanguard Group Inc | 1.63M | ▲ 28.31K |
| Dimensional Fund Advisors LP | 1.49M | ▲ 35.50K |
| Vanguard Capital Management LLC | 1.27M | ▲ 25.12K |
| American Century Companies Inc | 1.08M | ▼ 9.28K |
| Renaissance Technologies LLC | 1.03M | ▲ 76.92K |
| Raymond James Financial Inc | 996.43K | ▼ 33.07K |
| Geode Capital Management, LLC | 885.71K | ▲ 107.34K |
| Cwa Asset Management Group, LLC | 805.76K | ▲ 96.47K |
| State Street Corp | 691.69K | ▼ 813 |
| Morgan Stanley | 637.69K | ▼ 13.63K |
Held by 105 ETFs
Biggest fund positions in EPM by dollar value.
Recent insider transactions
Who's buying, who's selling, and how much.
| Date | Insider | Type | Shares |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 26 | Beatty Kelly | sell | 5,891 |
| Jun 30, 26 | Stash Ryan | sell | 27,321 |
| Jun 30, 26 | Bunch John Mark | sell | 28,518 |
| Jun 30, 26 | Loyd Kelly William | sell | 52,595 |
| Feb 20, 26 | Bunch John Mark | other | 8,910 |
| Dec 4, 25 | Herlin Robert S | other | 24,214 |
| Dec 4, 25 | Hargrave Marjorie Anne | other | 24,214 |
| Dec 4, 25 | Dozier William | other | 24,214 |
| Dec 4, 25 | DiPaolo Edward John | other | 24,214 |
| Dec 4, 25 | Bierria Myra C | other | 24,214 |
A “Sell” may be a pre-scheduled 10b5-1 plan sale rather than a discretionary decision — read insider selling with that in mind.
Our EPM coverage
Recent articles, reports, and earnings notes.
No research on EPM yet
For a full analyst-grade research report — grades, price targets, financials, chart analysis — generate one on demand.
Generate EPM report →Evolution Petroleum Closes Strategic Acquisition of Midland Basin Mineral & Royalty Interests
globenewswire.com · Aug 20
Evolution Petroleum Announces Pricing of Public Offering of Common Stock
globenewswire.com · Aug 19
Evolution Petroleum Announces Public Offering of Common Stock
globenewswire.com · Aug 18
Evolution Petroleum Announces Strategic Midland Basin Mineral & Royalty Acquisition
globenewswire.com · Aug 18
Evolution Petroleum: Solid Recent Production And Cost Performance
seekingalpha.com · Jul 3
Evolution Petroleum Corporation (EPM) Discusses Asset Base Growth Strategy and Role of Royalty Acquisitions in Enhancing Shareholder Returns Transcript
seekingalpha.com · Jun 10
Evolution Petroleum to Participate in Water Tower Research Fireside Chat on June 10th
globenewswire.com · Jun 3
Evolution Petroleum: Brutal Market Timing Lessons Available Here
seekingalpha.com · May 30
Headlines from third-party outlets — TickerSpark isn't affiliated with these sources.