IonQ, Inc.
Built from real-time financials, refreshed daily. For a full Analyst Grade with bull/bear case, price targets, and qualitative risk analysis, generate a IONQ research report →
Range $49 – $75
Price Chart
About the company
IonQ, Inc. specializes in the creation of advanced, general-purpose quantum computing systems. The company provides customers with access to its 20-qubit quantum computers.
- CEO
- Niccolo Mcleod de Masi
- IPO
- 2021
- Employees
- 1,132
- HQ
- College Park, MD, US
AI snapshot
Six angles, distilled from the data.
IONQ remains in a strong multi-month uptrend and still trades above its 200-day average, keeping the longer-term trend constructive. The stock is well below its 52-week high of 84.64 but far above the 52-week low of 25.89, so the setup is a high-beta recovery rather than a mature breakout.
Street sentiment is constructive, with a Buy consensus and an average target around 64.75 versus a 47.1 share price. Recent calls are mixed at the margin: Morgan Stanley nudged its target to 49, while Jefferies cut to 75 from 85, leaving targets supportive but less aggressive than earlier in the year.
The earnings profile is still uneven, with 1 beat in the last 8 quarters and two straight misses after that February outlier. Next-year EPS estimates remain negative at -2.9666, so shareholders should watch whether revenue growth can keep improving beyond the latest 2.868% year-over-year gain.
Discretionary insider selling has outweighed buying, with four sales and no open-market purchases in the recent window. Most other activity is award, vesting, or in-kind compensation flow, which is noise; the only clear signal is net selling from directors and a special advisor.
Profitability is still deep in the red, but gross margin of 30.9% shows the model can generate meaningful unit economics. Operating margin remains negative at -4.0817, while ROE of -60.48% and ROA of -14.47% confirm the business is still scaling toward profitability rather than there yet.
IONQ sits in the quantum-computing niche, where it competes on access through AWS Braket, Azure Quantum, Google Cloud Marketplace, and direct cloud services. Versus the broader hardware group, it screens as a premium growth story with a negative earnings profile and a valuation that still depends on future execution.
Similar companies
Peers in the same neighborhood.
- Market Cap
- $15.50B
- P/E
- -9.68
- PEG
- -0.00
- P/S
- 62.89
- P/B
- 4.59
- EV/EBITDA
- 7.87
- Div Yield
- 0.00%
- Gross Margin
- 36.29%
- Op Margin
- -413.96%
- Net Margin
- -573.62%
- ROE
- -39.34%
- ROIC
- -15.54%
Latest fiscal year · YoY change
- Revenue
- $130.02M+201.9%
- Gross Profit
- $52.53M+133.7%
- Op Income
- $-633,715,000
- Net Income
- $-510,378,000-53.9%
- EPS
- $-1.82-16.7%
- OCF Growth
- -168.0%
- FCF Growth
- -131.8%
- 52W High
- $84.64
- 52W Low
- $25.89
- 50D MA
- $45.08
- 200D MA
- $45.03
- Beta
- 3.30
- RSI (14)
- 48
- Avg Volume
- 24.40M
Earnings call summaries
Pick a quarter — each call distilled into takeaways, results, and a bull vs bear read.
IonQ reported record second-quarter revenue of $80.1 million, up 287% year over year, and raised full-year 2026 revenue guidance after a quarter marked by strong organic growth, major technical milestones, and the closing of SkyWater.· August 5, 2026
- Q2 revenue was $80.1 million, up 287% year over year, and management said it was the strongest quarter in company history.
- Organic revenue grew 132% year over year; full-year organic growth is still expected to be about 100%.
- IonQ closed its $1.8 billion SkyWater acquisition, which management said makes it a vertically integrated, onshore quantum platform with fabrication, packaging and deployment under one roof.
- The company said it received its first fully featured, fully integrated QPUs back from SkyWater and is testing them in College Park, with commissioning of systems targeted to begin in 2027.
- Full-year 2026 revenue guidance was raised to $280 million to $290 million for IonQ only, before any combined-company guidance is given later.
IonQ reported second-quarter 2026 GAAP revenue of $80.1 million, up 287% year over year, and said the quarter exceeded its own expectations by 20%. Management also said Q2 organic revenue grew 132% year over year. GAAP operating expenses were $417.3 million, including $160.6 million of R&D, while non-GAAP operating expenses were $201.2 million. Adjusted EBITDA was negative $120.3 million, including about $20 million of additional SkyWater spending and about $10 million of higher pre-integration costs. GAAP net loss was negative $1.9 billion, primarily due to a roughly $1.6 billion noncash mark-to-market warrant valuation impact. RPO ended Q2 at $485 million, up from $470 million in Q1 and $122 million a year ago. For 2026, IonQ raised revenue guidance to $280 million to $290 million, but said this is IonQ-only guidance and that combined-company guidance will come later after integration; management also reiterated expectations for about 100% organic revenue growth for the full year.
Niccolo de Masi framed the quarter as proof that IonQ’s strategy is working across computing, networking, security, sensing and semiconductor manufacturing. He emphasized the shift from laser-based control to electronic qubit control, saying the company is scaling toward millions of qubits via semiconductor pathways and that the first integrated QPUs from SkyWater are now under test. His tone was highly confident and expansive, repeatedly describing IonQ as the sector’s pace-setter and merchant supplier while linking the business to U.S. and allied national security priorities.
Inder Singh highlighted that Q2 revenue of $80.1 million came with 287% year-over-year growth and 20% upside versus the company’s expectations. He said the biggest revenue driver was fifth-generation quantum computing deployments, while commercial revenue was 60% of the total, international revenue was about 50%, and multiproduct sales were about 25% of revenue and up 40% year over year. On the cost side, he cited $417.3 million of GAAP OpEx, $201.2 million of non-GAAP OpEx, $120.3 million of adjusted EBITDA loss, and $1.9 billion of GAAP net loss driven largely by warrant revaluation. He also noted $485 million of RPO and raised full-year revenue guidance to $280 million to $290 million, while explaining that SkyWater-related intercompany eliminations and purchase accounting mean the company will provide combined guidance later.
Analysts focused on how fast MOUs and government relationships could convert into revenue, and management said nothing from the Anduril/Sandia-related work is included in RPOs or guidance yet because those efforts are still early. On the roadmap, management said the key next step is moving from chip prototypes to commissioning systems and customer deployments in the first half of next year, with 256-qubit systems targeted first and 10,000-qubit work progressing in parallel. Questions also pressed on executive-order demand and foundry strategy; management said demand is broad-based across government and enterprise, and that SkyWater will serve both IonQ’s roadmap and the wider quantum ecosystem as a merchant supplier with strong IP protections.
The quarter showed very strong top-line momentum, with revenue, organic growth and RPO all moving higher while management said demand is broadening across computing, security, networking and sensing. IonQ also pointed to major technical progress, including integrated QPUs from SkyWater, breakeven quantum error correction on a Tempo test system, and a path to commissioning systems in 2027.
The business is still spending heavily, with negative adjusted EBITDA of $120.3 million and a GAAP net loss of $1.9 billion, and management said SkyWater integration will require more accounting work before combined guidance is available. Several revenue opportunities discussed on the call, including MOUs and new government relationships, were described as early-stage and not yet included in RPO or guidance, while management also acknowledged execution risks in scaling multiple chip generations and integrating the acquisition.
AI summary of the company's earnings call · Paraphrased · Not investment advice
- Free Float
- 99.3%
- Shares Outstanding
- 373.27M
- Float Shares
- 370.50M
of shares held by institutions
702 13F filers
Buy/sell ratio 0.75. Sells can include pre-scheduled 10b5-1 plan sales, not just discretionary selling.
Congressional trading
Senate and House stock disclosures for IONQ, newest first.
| Member | Type | Traded | |
|---|---|---|---|
| W. Gregory SteubeHouse · FL17 | Buy | Mar 18, 26 | Filing → |
Source: public STOCK Act disclosures. Filed weeks after the trade — a lagging signal, not a real-time one.
Top institutional holders
Largest 13F positions, with quarter-over-quarter change.
| Holder | Shares | Δ Quarter |
|---|---|---|
| Vanguard Group Inc | 34.77M | ▲ 5.42M |
| Morgan Stanley | 26.28M | ▲ 5.12M |
| Blackrock, Inc. | 20.90M | ▼ 8.97M |
| Vanguard Capital Management LLC | 15.60M | ▲ 534.50K |
| State Street Corp | 8.12M | ▼ 1.15M |
| Ubs Group AG | 7.90M | ▲ 2.09M |
| Bank Of America Corp | 6.47M | ▲ 4.66M |
| Geode Capital Management, LLC | 6.46M | ▼ 1.98M |
| Norges Bank | 5.19M | ▲ 5.19M |
| Marex Group PLC | 3.71M | ▼ 298.30K |
| D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. | 2.69M | ▲ 789.59K |
| Charles Schwab Investment Management Inc | 2.37M | ▼ 532.40K |
Held by 697 ETFs
Biggest fund positions in IONQ by dollar value.
Recent insider transactions
Who's buying, who's selling, and how much.
| Date | Insider | Type | Shares |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 26 | TOLEDANO GABRIELLE B | other | 4,526 |
| Jun 18, 26 | TOLEDANO GABRIELLE B | sell | 2,757 |
| Jun 17, 26 | Chou Kathryn K. | other | 4,526 |
| Jun 18, 26 | Chou Kathryn K. | sell | 2,757 |
| Jun 18, 26 | Raymond John w | sell | 3,815 |
| Jun 17, 26 | FRANKOLA JIM | other | 4,526 |
| Jun 17, 26 | TEUBER WILLIAM J JR | other | 4,526 |
| Jun 16, 26 | Singh Inder M | other | 2,617 |
| Jun 17, 26 | Scannell William F | other | 4,526 |
| Jun 11, 26 | de Masi Niccolo | other | 16,120 |
A “Sell” may be a pre-scheduled 10b5-1 plan sale rather than a discretionary decision — read insider selling with that in mind.
Our IONQ coverage
Recent articles, reports, and earnings notes.

Quantum stocks need proof, not another narrative
The quantum trade is shifting from a broad future-computing bet to a test of revenue, catalysts, and cash durability. IONQ, RGTI, and QBTS now need to prove they can close the gap with better-funded work at GOOG and IBM.

The GENESIS MISSION Linchpin, Revealed: Every Stock Keith Kohl Is Teasing in Technology and Opportunity
Keith Kohl of Angel Publishing/Outsider Club is selling the "Light-Speed Profits" and "Genesis Mission Linchpin" pitch. We identify its three-stock basket and test the AI-power claims.

D-Wave Quantum IPO: The Bull and Bear Case for QBTS
D-Wave Quantum Inc. (NASDAQ: QBTS) is expected to list on 2026-07-27, but the price range has not been disclosed. The setup is a bull case built on rapid revenue growth and a large cash balance, versus a bear case centered on dilution, losses, and a still-early quantum market.
Want a deeper read on IONQ?
Generate a full analyst-grade report — bull/bear case, price targets, valuation depth, and a complete financial breakdown.
Rigetti Drops 7%, IonQ Sinks 6%, D-Wave Falls 4%: What's Behind the Quantum Stock Selloff?
247wallst.com · Aug 20
IonQ's Space Contract Points to a New Frontier for Quantum Investors
marketbeat.com · Aug 19
How IonQ Could Benefit From Its Latest Quantum Collaborations
zacks.com · Aug 19
3 Quantum Computing Stocks With the Most Upside in August
247wallst.com · Aug 19
3 Quantum Computing Stocks With the Most Upside in August
247wallst.com · Aug 19
Quantum Stocks Fall Tuesday as Rates Force Rotation: IonQ Down 6%, D-Wave Drops 6%, Rigetti Falls 5%
247wallst.com · Aug 18
IonQ and CMC Microsystems Announce Collaboration to Expand Cloud Quantum Computing Access in Canada
businesswire.com · Aug 18
Two Quantum Computing Stocks Are Starting to Pull Ahead of the Pack
fool.com · Aug 18
Headlines from third-party outlets — TickerSpark isn't affiliated with these sources.
AI analysis · Last refreshed August 17, 2026 · Live quote · Not investment advice